Federal Communications Commission | Clear Channel Communications | The Prodigy | L-3 Communications | Communications Act 2003 | Rogers Communications | communications satellite | Discovery Communications | Charter Communications | Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act | Salem Communications | MCI Communications | communications | Reliance Communications | Nuance Communications | Adelphia Communications Corporation | Verizon Communications | Prodigy | Child prodigy | Warner Communications | Theatre Communications Group | Minister of Transport and Communications (Norway) | Frontier Communications | Communications satellite | Communications protocol | Communications Decency Act | XO Communications | Tele-Communications Inc. | Ministry of Transportation and Communications (Republic of China) | Luken Communications |
Judge Colleen McMahon of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Prodigy Communications Corporation had not infringed the patent held by British Telecommunications Plc through its use of hyperlinks.