Sony Betamax Case Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc., Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc , accessed January 26, 2011.
Sony | Sony BMG | Sony Music Entertainment | Sony Computer Entertainment | Sony Pictures Entertainment | Sony Pictures Television | News Corp | Sony/ATV Music Publishing | Sony Entertainment Television Asia | Ronald Corp | Warrick Sony | Sony Pictures Studios | Sony Pictures Imageworks | Sony Online Entertainment | Sony Music Entertainment Japan | Sony Music Australia | Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. | Sony Alpha | Sony Wonder | Sony Pictures Animation | Sony Entertainment Network | Sony Records | Sony Pictures Classics | Sony Music Latin | Sony Electronics | Sina Corp | Schottenstein Stores Corp. | Chubb Corp. | Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. | Sony Pictures Mobile |
2012: Osamu Kumagai, Sony Corp., “Multi-Wavelength Laser Diode for Backward Compatibility of Three Generations’ Optical Disc Systems”
One other major consequence of the Betamax technology's introduction to the U.S. was the lawsuit Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios (1984, the "Betamax case"), with the U.S. Supreme Court determining home videotaping to be legal in the United States, wherein home videotape cassette recorders were a legal technology since they had substantial noninfringing uses.
In February 2013, Juki and Sony Corp. entered negotiations to discuss a merger of their SMT equipment businesses.
In early 2012, Sony Corp restructured its India business by creating two separate units, one for undertaking sales and marketing operations, headquartered at New Delhi and the other for focusing on software and product development based in Bangalore.