Decision at Sundown | Aakhari Decision | Record of Decision | NATO Double-Track Decision | Executive Decision | decision-making | decision | Your Decision | ''Talkin' 2 Myself'' and ''Decision'' | Seitz decision | Per curiam decision | ''per curiam'' decision | MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems | info-gap decision theory | Hunger (Eternal Decision song) | Essence of Decision | Ecosystem Management Decision Support | decision theory | Decision Sciences Institute | decision problem | decision makers' | Decision House | Decision Before Dawn | decision (baseball) | Admissible decision rule |
In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001, 310 F.3d 717 (2002), is a per curiam decision by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review in which it reviewed restrictions that were placed upon a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) application by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) on May 17, 2002.
In a later per curiam decision captioned In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001, the court upheld a provision of the Patriot Act that made it easier for law enforcement officers and intelligence officers to share information with each other.
Two justices (Stanley Forman Reed and Harold Hitz Burton) dissented from the short, unsigned per curiam majority opinion, arguing MLB and its revenue sources had changed enough since 1922 that the logic of that case no longer applied.
•
A one-paragraph unsigned per curiam opinion was followed by a longer dissent by Justice Harold Hitz Burton, joined by Stanley Forman Reed.