Top Gear (current format) | Electric current | Boston Legal | A Current Affair | Alternating current | Swift Current | Legal case | Direct current | Current 93 | alternating current | direct current | Current TV | Legal drama | High-voltage direct current | Fairly Legal | Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries | Swift Current Broncos | Street-legal vehicle | Office of Legal Counsel | Legal guardian | Labrador Current | Kuroshio Current | ABS-CBN News and Current Affairs | Southern Legal Resource Center | Residual-current device | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund | Legal technicality | Legal separation | Legal practice |
Distinguished academic writers have criticised the principle of assumption of responsibility as often resting on a fiction used to justify a conclusion that a duty of care exists: see Barker, 'Unreliable Assumptions in the Modern Law of Negligence' 1993 109 LQR 461; Hepple, 'The Search for Coherence' (1997) Current Legal Problems, Vol 50, 67, at 88; Cane, Tort Law and Economic Interests 2nd ed.