Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of South Africa, which made technical changes related to the election of provincial legislature and the National Council of Provinces
•
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, part of the Bill of Rights, prohibiting unreasonable searches, seizures, and recognizing Americans' natural right of privacy.
•
Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland, which lowered the voting age from twenty-one to eighteen
First Amendment to the United States Constitution | First Amendment | Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Equal Rights Amendment | Second Amendment to the United States Constitution | Fourth International | Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Fifth Amendment | Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Fourth Crusade | Fourth Amendment | United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit | Second Amendment | Poor Law Amendment Act 1834 | Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Fourth | Fourteenth Amendment | Eighteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Born on the Fourth of July | seventeenth amendment | Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | Nineteenth Amendment | French Fourth Republic | fourth | Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution | constitutional amendment | Born on the Fourth of July (film) | War of the Fourth Coalition |
Habeeb's attorneys charged that the agents had stopped Habeeb for his ethnic appearance, and that his detention violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.
Atwater and her husband, Michael Haas, an emergency room physician at a local hospital, filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with Charles Lincoln being the lawyer who launched the case, alleging that the city violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizures by arresting her for a crime whose only punishment was a fine.
Cherney and the late Bari's estate were awarded $4.4 million for violations of the First Amendment (freedom of speech) and the Fourth Amendment (the right to be free from unlawful arrest and illegal search and seizure).
The Ninth Circuit held that § 647(e) violated the Fourth Amendment because it allowed arrest without probable cause, that it was void for vagueness, and that it invited arbitrary enforcement.
Reichel argued in this case that the Fourth Amendment requires officers to provide a copy of the search warrant to the homeowner when conducting a search.
Judge Victor Marrero of the Southern District of New York found on 28 September 2004, that NSLs violate the Fourth Amendment ("it has the effect of authorizing coercive searches effectively immune from any judicial process") and First Amendment.
In 1981, the luggage of Worthy and two other journalists working with him, Terri Taylor and Randy Goodman, was seized by the FBI and CIA on their return from Iran; and they subsequently won a suit on Fourth Amendment grounds.
This holding predates by several months the more famous case of Katz v. United States, which extended Fourth Amendment protection to a conversation in a public phone booth based on the speaker's reasonable expectation of privacy.
The Fourth Amendment Restoration Act is a proposed bill introduced by Senator Rand Paul on June 7, 2013.
The idea that minorities have to somehow “prove” that racial discrimination was being used during a search and seizure (United States v. Armstrong, 1996) and that the Equal Protection Law has been separated from the Fourth Amendment through successive court decisions leaves the accused at a disadvantage.
The Michigan Supreme Court had found sobriety roadblocks to be a violation of the Fourth Amendment.
In the majority opinion, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote, "In sum, the balance of the State's interest in preventing drunken driving, the extent to which this system can reasonably be said to advance that interest, and the degree of intrusion upon individual motorists who are briefly stopped, weighs in favor of the state program. We therefore hold that it is consistent with the Fourth Amendment."
The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA court) has used this ruling to expanded the "special needs doctrine" that carves out an exception to the Fourth Amendment for the broad collection and examination of Americans' data to track possible terrorists.
In Katz v. United States, Justice Harlan evolved a two-prong test to determine when an object may be the subject of a Fourth Amendment protection.
Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753 (1985), was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which held that a compelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body for evidence implicates expectations of privacy and security of such magnitude that the intrusion would be "unreasonable" under the Fourth Amendment, even if likely to produce evidence of a crime.