Equal Rights Amendment | Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better | Equal Vision Records | Separate Tables | Equal opportunity | Seven Separate Fools | List of rulers of separate Emirates of the United Arab Emirates | Equal Pay Act | The area shaded under ''Jorvik'' (i.e. York) may correspond very roughly with Oslac's territory; York was not regarded as separate from the rest of the Danelaw | Separate school | Separate Coastal Army | Out & Equal | March on Washington for Lesbian, Gay and Bi Equal Rights and Liberation | Holy Spirit Roman Catholic Separate Regional Division No. 4 | Equal Treatment Directive | Equal Scary People | Equal opportunity employment | Equal Opportunities Commission | Equal-Armed Cross | equal-armed cross | Equal Access to Justice Act | equal | A Separate Peace | 31 equal temperament | 17 equal temperament |
The term Jim Crow economy applies to a specific set of economic conditions during the period when the Jim Crow laws were in effect; however, it should also be taken as an attempt to disentangle the economic ramifications from the politico-legal ramifications of "separate but equal" de jure segregation, to consider how the economic impacts might have persisted beyond the politico-legal ramifications.
Finally, the case ended in the Supreme Court of the United States in Plessy v. Ferguson with the judgment being upheld, leading to the judicial sanction of "separate but equal".
In a 7-to-1 ruling, Associate Justice Stanley Forman Reed fashioned an "undue burden" test to decide the constitutionality of a Virginia law requiring separate but equal racial segregation in public transportation.
Plessy's action ultimately led to the Plessy v. Ferguson decision by the United States Supreme Court, which affirmed the legality of "separate-but-equal" facilities.
Loeb supported segregation, declaring support for "separate but equal facilities" and describing court-ordered integration as "anarchy".
Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the ruling of the Supreme Court: “We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”
The State-controlled radio and television quite successfully fed us a sanitized version of the truth and from the pulpits of the Dutch Reformed Church religious leaders extolled the Nationalists’ version of ‘loving thy neighbour as thyself’ in the comforting guise of ‘separate but equal’.