The judgment in CFPH's applications was the first in a flurry of UK court cases starting in 2005 involving re-consideration by the High Court of patent applications refused by the UKIPO and made many references to the practice of the EPO.
•
The case in question had been refused by the UKIPO and by J Laddie on Appeal before the High Court.
•
It is interesting to theorise whether there would have been any way for Fujitsu to have obtained a granted patent.
•
Fujitsu's claimed invention was a new tool for modelling crystal structures on a computer.
•
Citing as reasons this clear divergence in reasoning between the UK courts and the European Patent Office, Neal Macrossan sought leave to appeal the refusal of his patent application to the House of Lords.
United States | United Kingdom | Republican Party (United States) | Democratic Party (United States) | United States House of Representatives | President of the United States | United Nations | United States Senate | United States Navy | United States Army | Supreme Court of the United States | United States Air Force | Native Americans in the United States | United States Congress | Parliament of the United Kingdom | Law & Order | 66th United States Congress | Prime Minister of the United Kingdom | 74th United States Congress | 18th United States Congress | 73rd United States Congress | 54th United States Congress | 61st United States Congress | United States Marine Corps | United States Department of Defense | 64th United States Congress | 65th United States Congress | 53rd United States Congress | 52nd United States Congress | 55th United States Congress |