Whirlpool Corporation | Whirlpool | News Corp | Ronald Corp | Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. | Whirlpool Productions | Sina Corp | Schottenstein Stores Corp. | Chubb Corp. | Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment Corp. | Sony Corp. | Quill Corp. v. North Dakota | News Corp (company) | Miroku Corp. | Casino Magic Corp. | Aaron Corp | Wallace v. International Business Machines Corp. et al. | Shimadzu Corp. | Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States | Potlatch Corp. | News Corp. | Microsoft Corp. | MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc. | Jean-Baptiste Drouet, Comte d'Erlon's Corp I | Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Intel Corp. | Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. | El Paso Wrecking Corp. (1978 film) | El Paso Wrecking Corp. | Czecho Slovak Commercial Corp. |
Along with the related decision, Camco v. Whirlpool (2001), 9 C.P.R. (4th) 129 (SCC), the Supreme Court of Canada rejected the doctrine of equivalents applied in the United States and adopted the doctrine of purposive construction, as originally applied by the United Kingdom House of Lords in Catnic v. Hill & Smith.