Something Corporate | Order of Corporate Reunion | One Corporate Centre | Ministry of Corporate Affairs | stakeholder (corporate) | Ministry of Corporate Affairs (India) | Corporate spin-off | corporate | Nightwork: Sexuality, Pleasure, and Corporate Masculinity in a Tokyo Hostess Club | Corporate title | Corporate social responsibility | Corporate identity | corporate identity | Corporate design | corporate crime | The Corporate Executive Board Company | Stakeholder (corporate) | North (Something Corporate album) | King Report on Corporate Governance | Institute for Corporate Culture Affairs | General Electric's Corporate Research and Development Center | European Corporate Governance Institute | Corporate transparency | Corporate Training Unlimited | Corporate tax in the United States | corporate social responsibility | Corporate resolution | Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 | Corporate Flight Management | Corporate (film) |
Frieman's defense states that the wording of the restrictive highway signage refers specifically to "persons"; therefore, case law is applicable, going back to U.S. legal decisions from the 19th century, including Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad and to the more widely known 2010 "corporate personhood" case titled Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.