(1889–1950) was an American physicist noted for his editorship of Physical Review between 1926 and 1950.
The physics community's main vessel for new results are the Physical Review suite of scientific journals published by the American Physical Society and Applied Physics Letters published by the American Institute of Physics.
Physical Review X, a scientific journal published by the American Physical Society
In May 1940, Laurence published a front-page exclusive in the New York Times on successful attempts in isolating uranium-235 which were reported in Physical Review, and outlined many (somewhat hyperbolic) claims about the possible future of nuclear power.
Peer review | American Physical Society | Partisan Review | Physical medicine and rehabilitation | Electoral and Administrative Review Commission | National Review | Physical therapy | Physical fitness | Physical Education | physical education | The New York Times Book Review | North American Review | Monthly Review | The Paris Review | peer review | judicial review | Harvard Law Review | Columbia Journalism Review | Administrative Review Board | The New York Review of Books | Physical Review Letters | Saturday Review | Physical chemistry | National Physical Laboratory | Physical Review | physical chemistry | physical | Lebedev Physical Institute | Harvard Business Review | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council |
The FT was first proposed and tested using computer simulations, by Denis Evans, E.G.D. Cohen and Gary Morriss in 1993 in the journal Physical Review Letters.
According to Slava Turyshev of JPL in the paper "Support for temporally varying behavior of the Pioneer anomaly from the extended Pioneer 10 and 11 data sets," published in Physical Review Letters in 2011, the anomaly has a temporally-decaying (not constant as previously thought) nature and points towards Earth.
The anonymous referee, who—as the current editor of the Physical Review recently confirmed, all parties now being deceased—was the combative cosmologist, Howard Percy Robertson, pointed out the error described below, and the manuscript was returned to the authors with a note from the editor asking them to revise the paper to address these concerns.