At the time of his appointment as a Judge, Eugene was working with the Blood Tribe to develop its Tribal Justice system, with plans to establish a Provincial Court on the Blood Reserve, which would incorporate a Peace-Making model of justice.
Supreme Court of the United States | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Supreme Court of India | High Court | Royal Court Theatre | High Court of Justice | International Criminal Court | New York Supreme Court | High Court of Australia | Supreme Court of Canada | European Court of Human Rights | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | International Court of Justice | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States | European Court of Justice | Permanent Court of Arbitration | New York Court of Appeals | Michigan Supreme Court | Crown Court | Supreme Court of California | Court of Appeal of England and Wales | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | court | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | Member of Provincial Parliament (Ontario) | Court of Common Pleas | United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom |
Josephson articled at the Nelson law firm of Stewart Enderton, and became notable in 1975 for being named a Provincial Court judge at the age of only 29.
Manitoba's judiciary consists of three courts: the Court of Appeal, the Court of Queen's Bench, and the Provincial Court.
The Commission of Inquiry was composed of Alvin Hamilton, former Associate Chief Justice of Manitoba of the Court of Queen's Bench, and Murray Sinclair, then Associate Chief Judge of the Provincial Court, and currently a Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench.
In the case of faculties, appeal lies to the provincial court (either the Arches Court for Canterbury or the Chancery Court for York), and then to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
In 2005 the Presiding Judge of the Provincial Court in Ruhengeri, Rwanda ruled that Witnesses should not be imprisoned for refusing to bear arms in civil defense 'night patrols' since they were willing to participate and had participated in other forms of community service.
After Provincial Superior Court a further appeal would go to the Provincial Court of Appeal (e.g. the Court of Appeal of Alberta), and then finally to the Supreme Court of Canada, but as a practical matter very few summary convictions are ever heard by the Supreme Court of Canada.