Systematic reviews of the scientific literature have concluded that that there are no difference in the long-term mental health of women who obtain induced abortions as compared to women in appropriate control groups.
Peer review | Partisan Review | Electoral and Administrative Review Commission | National Review | The New York Times Book Review | North American Review | Monthly Review | The Paris Review | peer review | judicial review | Harvard Law Review | Columbia Journalism Review | Administrative Review Board | The New York Review of Books | Physical Review Letters | Saturday Review | Physical Review | Harvard Business Review | Edinburgh Review | Combatant Status Review Tribunal | Virginia Quarterly Review | The Polish Review | Strategic Defence Review | Poetry Review | New Left Review | Far Eastern Economic Review | Columbia Law Review | Claremont Review of Books | American Sociological Review | American Political Science Review |
Based on evidence from multiple randomized clinical trials (RCTs), a systematic review published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (October 2006) stated that CBT and GET interventions showed promising results, appearing to reduce symptoms and improve function.
A 2006 systematic review published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine included 5 eligible studies on GET and found an overall effect in the reduction of symptoms and improvement to physical functioning.
According to one systematic review, it is equally effective as praziquantel for treating S. mansoni infections.