Supreme Court of the United States | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Supreme Court of India | High Court | Royal Court Theatre | High Court of Justice | International Criminal Court | New York Supreme Court | High Court of Australia | Supreme Court of Canada | European Court of Human Rights | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | International Court of Justice | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States | European Court of Justice | Permanent Court of Arbitration | New York Court of Appeals | Michigan Supreme Court | Crown Court | Supreme Court of California | Court of Appeal of England and Wales | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | court | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | Court of Common Pleas | United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | trial | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom |
Court of oyer and terminer and a judge in the Court of Common Pleas for Middlesex County and as a school trustee for Woodbridge Township.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg sitting on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision of the trial court and held that Breakout was a copyrightable work.
Discretion for the criminal trial court to grant or deny a continuance is ultimately limited and defined by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
The Illinois Attorney General's case was somewhat weak, however, and the trial court judge rebuked the state several times on the opening day for abusing the judicial process.
For example, on April 16, 2007, the Supreme Court of California unanimously affirmed a trial court judgment requiring the company to pay an additional hour of pay for each day that a store manager had been forced to work a nine-hour shift without a break.
She was previously a trial court judge on Michigan's Third Circuit Court in Wayne County.
After the subsequent re-trial, the trial court awarded Masimo, Susman Godfrey’s client, a final judgment of $43.5 million in damages in June 2007, as well as attorneys' fees.
The I.S. was first filed as Criminal Case No. 01-081 at the Makati City Regional Trial Court Branch 133 on June 26, 2000, then refiled as Criminal Case No. 02-2704 at Makati City RTC Branch 64, only to be re-ordered back to Branch 133.
Chief Justice Earl Warren, writing for the majority, held that the three-judge trial court was properly convened and that the Court therefore had jurisdiction over the appeal, citing Idlewild Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713.