Castile (historical region) | Royal Historical Society | Conservative Party of Canada (historical) | Britons (historical) | historical revisionism | American Historical Association | The Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract | Ohio Historical Society | Historical Society of Pennsylvania | Historical revisionism | Wisconsin Historical Society | Texas State Historical Association | Champagne (historical province) | Virginia Historical Society | Texas Historical Commission | State Historical Museum | Historical linguistics | Historical Enquiries Team | Conservative Party of Quebec (historical) | Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park | Buffalo Bill Historical Center | Basque Country (historical territory) | Tennessee Historical Commission | Royal Historical Society of Victoria | Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland | Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts | Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park | Rhode Island Historical Society | Ostrobothnia (historical province) | Norwegian-American Historical Association |
Loren Glass argues from a historical materialist and autonomist perspective that Zizek's critique is stronger than other critical theoretical responses (such as those of Jean Baudrillard and Paul Virilio) because it is "cautiously optimistic" about the possibility for ethical action, whereas other critics have remained pessimistic.