This decision met with strong opposition and in August 2013 campaigners, including the Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE), the Surrey Green Party and the Leatherhead Residents' Association, won a High Court appeal to overturn that decision, on the basis that the project would have an adverse effect on a landscape and area of outstanding natural beauty, and that Surrey did not need another golf course, having 141 already.
Supreme Court of the United States | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | Supreme Court of India | High Court | Royal Court Theatre | High Court of Justice | International Criminal Court | New York Supreme Court | High Court of Australia | Supreme Court of Canada | European Court of Human Rights | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit | International Court of Justice | United States District Court for the Southern District of New York | Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States | European Court of Justice | Permanent Court of Arbitration | New York Court of Appeals | Michigan Supreme Court | Crown Court | Supreme Court of California | Court of Appeal of England and Wales | United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | court | United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit | Court of Common Pleas | United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom | Court of Arbitration for Sport |